You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Data Visualization’ category.
If you are like me and watch an unhealthy amount of professional basketball, it would behoove you to check out Stats.NBA.com and spend the next, oh, 8 hours or so poring over “advanced metrics.” New statistical categories like TS% (True Shooting Percentage), PIE (Player Impact Estimate), and EFF (Efficiency Rating), have been created in the past few years to explain the game in ways plain ol’ points, rebounds, and assists cannot.
The “statistical revolution” in basketball was started by nerds, embraced by bloggers, co-opted by front offices, and is now packaged in friendly charts and graphs. The site is comprehensive, easy to use, and pretty to look at. Check it out.
More and more often developers are skipping the PC when designing consumer applications. The latest example is Google’s new Flipboard competitor: Google Currents. Like Flipboard, the application is designed to make a tablet or mobile magazine reading experience better and more interactive. The one interesting wrinkle is that it’s also set up to import your Google reader feeds, taking that content and making it beautiful. It’s good enough that it makes me want to read the content on my phone instead of on my laptop.
Also this week, Twitter released a new version this week. The trick to get the new look and functionality? You had to download it to your Android or iPhone first.
Data visualization has been a hot topic lately, so when I stumbled across this great tongue-in-cheek infographic by Grip Limited about the roles within an advertising agency I couldn’t help but share. This post goes out to all of our agency partners, W5 wouldn’t be the same without you.
Voyurl, a new data mining service that allows web browsers to collect and analyze their own surf data, wants to give consumers the same power as advertisers to assess their web behavior: Voyurl collects search and surf data to make content recommendations, and to allow individual consumers to analyze their own behavioral trends.
It’s an interesting take on the ongoing privacy debate over tracking consumer behavior online – Voyurl hopes that by putting the same information in consumer hands that third-parties are collecting on them, they will be able to leverage this knowledge in an empowering way.
Curious to see what others are reading into your surfing habits? Sign up for a beta account here.
The U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies has long supported (for the past ~5 years) an online system for pulling area-based employment and residence data using a visual map-based selection tool called OnTheMap. This software is fairly intuitive and fun to use, but can also be quite useful in exploring a specific market or region to understand where workers live and work, and how that has changed over time.
OnTheMap is useful for more than work location, however. It’s a multi-layered mapping tool, with companion data on demographics, earnings, industry characteristics. We’ve also used it to identify exact metropolitan statistical areas and radius ranges, to find transportation routes, greenspace, and tribal and military lands, and to simply better understand a physical marketplace.
For years, organizations like the Census Bureau relied heavily on point-in-time estimates, tables of statistics and physical and static maps for data exploration like this. As new systems come online, are developed further, and improved over successive versions, our ability to access information from our desktops is not only facilitated but empowered.
The Chronicle of Higher Education has an interesting infographic showing the percentage of adults with college degrees by county. They’ve added a nice piece of interaction that lets you follow changes over time since the 1940 census. You can view by gender, ethnicity, county, etc. Check out the full interactive version here.
In 1956 Dr. Werner Buchholz coined the term byte to mean a unit of digital information equal to eight bits. In today’s world, the amount of information represented by a single byte is extremely small. For the uninitiated, the prefixes representing the increasing scale of magnitude of information go: kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, terabyte, petabyte, and exabyte. For a frame of reference, a megabyte is a 500-page textbook. A gigabyte is a standard two-hour broadcast quality movie. A terabyte of CD-quality audio is about 2,000 hours (over 83 days) worth. The 2009 162-minute box office smash hit, Avatar, reportedly used one petabyte of data storage for all the 3D CGI effects. Five exabytes represents all the words ever spoken by all the human beings in the entire world.
Projections for 2011 show total internet traffic will be about 350 exabytes. It is mind-boggling to think, then, that Cisco Systems’ recently released Visual Networking Index estimates that by 2015 traffic will reach 966 exabytes, 34 exabytes shy of a zettabyte. A zettabyte, incidentally, could comfortably store a century’s worth of constant tweeting by all the inhabitants of Earth with room to spare.
So what explains the trend that will produce 966,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes of internet traffic in four years? According to Thomas Barnett, a senior manager at Cisco, this trend is largely based on a move away from short form media like low-quality YouTube videos to high definition full-length films on Netflix (Netflix accounts for 22.2% of all U.S. broadband traffic, increasing up to 30% at peak times). The exponential growth rate of internet traffic is also due to faster broadband connections – a 300% increase in average speed is projected by 2015 – and the worldwide proliferation of access to the internet.
Perhaps the most intriguing part of the entire study says that the number of devices connected to IP networks will outnumber the global population two to one by 2015. Not only that, but 54% of traffic will come from a wireless device which in theory means there will be one wireless device for every living human. This seems to present a chicken-or-the-egg dilemma: are media such as books and films migrating to the internet because of faster connections and a wider viewership or are more people using the internet because their favorite books and movies are now more readily available?